The listing of MONA M03 in Tucki: two bright spots and two shortcomings. Is low allocation more cost-effective?

通过admin

The listing of MONA M03 in Tucki: two bright spots and two shortcomings. Is low allocation more cost-effective?

Tucki MONA M03 has been put on the market, and three models have been launched, with the price range of 1198-155,800 yuan. Judging from the market response, the performance seems to be good, and the official said that it broke through 10,000 units within 52 minutes of listing. This article gives you an analysis of this new car to see what are the highlights and shortcomings.

One of the highlights: the pricing is indeed sincere, and the configuration is much higher than that of BYD Qin PLUS EV at the same price.

On the eve of listing, the official said that the starting price of this car was not higher than 135,900 yuan, and it was sold at 119,800 yuan after the official listing. It was really unexpected, and the configuration was not shabby. After comparing BYD Qin PLUS EV with Tucki MONA M03 with the same 119,800 yuan, we found that the latter had more head air curtains, a complete L2 driver assistance system, electric trunk, adaptive far and near light, panoramic sunroof and mobile phone wireless. In addition, it can be seen from here that BYD Qin PLUS seems to have room for price reduction.

The second highlight: the power consumption is very good, and the smaller battery achieves longer battery life.

Tucki MONA M03 entry-level version has a battery capacity of only 51.8 kWh, while CLTC has a battery life of 515 km. BYD Qin PLUS EV is a 57.6 kWh battery pack, with a battery life of 510 kilometers and a loss of 5 kilometers. Another example is MONA M03 in Tucki, with a 62.2-degree battery pack, which has a battery life of 620 kilometers, while AION S MAX has a battery life of 610 kilometers and uses a battery pack of 67.9 kWh. Among them, there is naturally the reason of the low wind resistance design of MONA M03 in Tucki (0.194Cd), but it can be seen that the electric control level of this car is still acceptable. In addition, I also suggest that if you value battery life, don’t add 4000 pieces to choose 19-inch wheels. The original 18-inch wheel is enough.

One of the disadvantages: the chassis specification is not high, and now torsion beams are rarely used for rear suspension.

Many people have a little problem with the front motor of MONA M03 in Tucki, but I think it is not a big problem. For the sake of energy saving, the front drive is indeed a more suitable choice, and there are many models with the front drive at the same level, but the rear suspension with torsion beam structure is a little less pleasant. After all, BYD Qin PLUS EV has used multi-link independent rear suspension. From the use experience, the vibration filtering performance of torsion beam on bumpy road surface is not as calm as that of multi-link independent suspension, and the handling experience is slightly inferior. Of course, most people drive on paved roads every day, and properly adjusted torsion beams can also provide a good experience. Considering that the price of this car is already so cheap, it is not so sinful to use torsion beams.

The second disadvantage: the high ratio with high-order intelligent driving is 26 thousand yuan, and the laser radar is not brought.

MONA M03 in Tucki supports high-level intelligent driving, has the function of urban NOA, and has no problems in automatic lane change, automatic on-ramp and other operations. Moreover, it is not equipped with lidar, and it is realized by pure vision. First of all, we must affirm Tucki, because the previous 150,000-class electric vehicles basically didn’t have the ability of high-level intelligent driving, and they could only reach the level of LCC, so Tucki has greatly lowered the threshold of intelligent driving. However, in terms of price setting, there is a doubt that the price of the high match is 26 thousand yuan more expensive than that of the middle match without high-level intelligent driving ability, which is a bit difficult to understand. Let’s take Tucki P7 as an example. The second lowest ratio with two laser radars is 16,000 yuan more expensive, while the high ratio without laser radar in MONA M03 in Tucki is 26,000 yuan more expensive. Perhaps the research and development cost of pure vision scheme is too high at this stage?

Full text summary

After analyzing the highlights and shortcomings, we can summarize this new car. Tucki MONA M03 is really excellent in terms of cost performance and endurance, with abundant configuration and good power consumption, which is also the reason why it will break through 10,000 in a short time. However, to be a 100,000-class car is to make a trade-off. Tucki MONA M03 also has some shortcomings, such as chassis specifications and price positioning of high-equipped models. Generally speaking, if you are looking for cost performance, Tucki MONA M03 is a worthy choice.

关于作者

admin administrator